Conclusions:
"Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."
Seldom do researchers use such definite language.
Here is a podcast interviewing the foremost experts in the world in the use of Ivermectin in the clinic:
If a doctor in NZ was to prescribe Ivermectin for anything other than parasitic infections, Medsafe would be knocking on their door, a "please explain" interrogation. About this time last year, it was made clear to doctors that this cheap off-patent, safe drug was not to be used as a prophylactic or treatment for COVID-19 infections. This action was part of their learning of the decks of all prevention and treatment options, other than patent vaccines.
I will say it again:
Nobody ever needed to die from COVID-19 unless they were already due to depart.
There are now several effective protective and preventive treatments available for preventing death by COVID-19. If only doctors were allowed to do their jobs without interference from those on High. I wonder why good doctors are being threatened, controlled and blocked from discussing these matters? Do you have any idea why?
By the way, did you know that most farmers will have a bottle of Ivermectin in the back of the shed? This drug is used as a drench for cattle and sheep. Refer to Roger Hubbard's comments about this below in the "Comments Section".