Barry "The Whistle": Hero - New Zealander of the Decade

(First published January, 2024, updated August 2026)

Whistleblower Exposes Disturbing Safety Concerns in Covid-19 Vaccination Database & What it Means

Is it a Red Card for mRNA Jabs?

Here's the latest that arrived hot into my email inbox today:

"The standout finding was that the single best-performing site in the entire country - the one with the lowest (and even favourable) mortality statistics - was located in Wellington Central, right in the seat of government. Barry notes that this variation suggests the doses were not uniform across New Zealand and raises the unresolved question of why the centre nearest Parliament produced such markedly different results."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay61IJ6o83U

Gary comments:

Wellington Central is the epicenter not just for politicians, but equally important, it was the epicenter for the senior bureaucrats and their teams who were making the decisions on the lockdowns and the mandating of administration of the experimental mRNA vaccines. These included not only the Ministry of Health but also the Accident Compensation Corporation's staff, which were handling the surge in claims for vaccine injuries. I can say this with a good deal of certainty, since I was, and still am one of those health professionals who was busy helping individuals file claims for alleged injuries suffered following the first rollout of the experimental mRNA vaccine drug.

It must be emphasised that the injury claims began rolling into the ACC and, presumably, the Ministry of Health, several months before the COVID infection became endemic within the New Zealand population. This is important. There could, for example, be no such thing as long COVID if a person contracted the condition before COVID was in New Zealand.

Anybody working for the ACC and the Ministry of Health with any good sense would have known that it was stupid to take this experimental injection. It is therefore no surprise that over 11,000 health officials and health professionals granted themselves exemptions. Here is the indisputable evidence of that self-granting of exemptions.

I noted from the very beginning of the mRNA vaccine rollouts that there were clusters of claims of injuries in places as near to our Central Wellington home as the Hutt Valley, Stokes Valley, Wainuiomata, and Masterton. My friend, Brian, living in Masterton, became an unlikley casualty. Even to this day, I cannot think of a single alleged mRNA vaccine injury for someone who lives in the Wellington Central area. There will surely be some, but none that I have dealt with personally. Yes, there was a surge in deaths in the Wellington region with the experimental mRNA vaccine rollout, but I emphasise the Wellington region, of which Wellington Central is a part.

If Barry is right and he seems to be right to me, then Wellington Central was apparently spared most of the alleged carnage. I'd just add that if any official employee of these agencies was aware themselves, sufficient to request or grant themselves an exemption from this experimental injection, then that is at least cowardly conduct, if not a lot worse. Therefore, Barry, in my opinion, is a national hero. But instead of being celebrated as a hero, our government is spending millions of dollars on ruining his career, financial security, and reputation, with the intention of throwing him in jail. I am not jumping to conclusions: Instead, we need conferences. We need scientific debate. We need proper inquiries to answer the kinds of concerns that Barry and many others have raised. Instead we have this:

Vaccine exemptions aside and significant they may be, Barry is implying something else, and much more sinister, for which there is plausible evidence. Barry is implying that there were batches of the drug with different potencies. It was alleged very early on, well before Barry spoke out, that some batches were as benign as saline while others were close to being kill shots. I think he is right to suspect that some of the shots were in fact close to being kill shots. Yes, I am aware of clusters of individuals alleging injuries who received shots from the same geographic area, some from the same clinic. I am aware of a married couple who both contracted, and were diagnosed as suffering from myocarditis the day following their COVID-19 experimental mRNA shots, and it is worthy of noting that they received their shots from the same vial.

Just how rare is it for a married couple to develop myocarditis on the same day? Inspired by Barry's calculations for the incredible odds of the kinds of coincidence that he identified in the data, I decided to do my own calculations for this married couple. Medsafe NZ reported that, before vaccination, approximately 95 people were diagnosed with myocarditis annually. Against a population of roughly five million at that time, this corresponds to approximately 1.9 cases per 100,000 people annually. Applying that crude national rate, the chance of two specified people independently developing myocarditis on the same specified day would be roughly one in 370 trillion. Medsafe’s New Zealand safety report. The estimated background probability is comparable to selecting one particular star, at random, from somewhere among all the stars contained in roughly one thousand to several thousand Milky Way galaxies. While this is an epidemiological observation, not proof that the vaccine or vial caused either diagnosis, it comes across to me as more a massive, incomprehnsible barrage of smoking canons, than a smoking gun - a barrage that the Royal Commission of Inquiry failed to hear, smell, or see.

I have now written at least 600 articles on the COVID-19 debacle. Here is my collection of 400.

---

Here is my earlier article about our national hero, Barry "The Whistle"

Someone within the Ministry of Health, an extremely credible, well-placed, and qualified source, has bravely supplied the following statement for publication (I have edited their statement a little to protect their anonymity because I do not want to be responsible for them losing their job and becoming unemployable by way of ostracism):

"Hi Gary, in your blog, you had a question relating to the accuracy of Barry’s data. It is accurate. I know this because (Deleted xxxx......). The data collection is very simple. Vaccination data has a person's id and date of vaccination. The person's id is linked to the register of births and deaths from which one gets the date of birth and if there, date of death. Can’t be simpler.The MOH has audit procedures to ensure pay-per-dose vaccination data is valid and accurate. Even though I had nothing to do with Barry's actions, I know the data he used is valid."

What are the implications of this data and what else do we know?

1. It confirms New Zealand is in the midst of a slow-motion genocide.

2. From the very beginning and to this day, this horror is being concealed from the public.

3. Despite the increasing evidence disproving it, politicians, health officials, and health experts persist in spreading false information about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, and actively encourage and administer it.

4. They are using fear and intimidation, social exclusion, cancellation, and complete suppression to conceal their wrongdoings.

5. Billions of dollars were borrowed to secure favour and silence, including from the media, resulting in the burden of massive debt for both present and future generations.

6. Their actions are resulting in deaths and many people becoming chronically sick, intergenerationally, which is putting the health system at risk of collapsing.

7. They exempted and protected themselves from genocide, while imposing it upon their fellow citizens: The Ministry of Health Granted Vaccine Exemptions to Hundreds Among Its Key Staff

8. Their actions are in violation of the Nuremberg Code and the Hippocratic Oath, which dictate that they must prioritise avoiding harm.

9. Those individuals who persist in deceiving, advocating for, and administering the "jab" must be held to account before the people, then sentenced to prison or receiving even harsher consequences.

---

(Gary Moller, a healthcare professional with over fifty years of experience, has written this essay to offer his insights, and to encourage thoughtful discussions on significant health matters).

---

Is Barry a Hero!

Barry Young was a dedicated employee at Health NZ, where he played a crucial role in developing and managing a Covid-19 vaccination database. This database was responsible for tracking pay-per-dose providers, including doctors and chemists administering the vaccines.

However, Barry's commitment to his work led him down a path of unsettling discoveries. Within the data, he noticed disturbing clusters of deaths occurring at certain vaccination centres. According to the data, in some cases, death rates following COVID mRNA vaccinations reached an alarming 28 percent. These findings raised significant safety concerns that demanded immediate attention.

Please read this article then come back to this one:

Did they Die of Natural Causes and On Time, or Are We Witnessing Democide?

Despite Barry's efforts to bring these red flags to the attention of NZ Health, his concerns fell on deaf ears. Tormented by what he had uncovered and haunted by the potential risks, Barry made the courageous decision to blow the whistle on the situation. His conscience guided him to act.

When do Lies become Crimes?

Unfortunately, Barry's act of bravery did not go unnoticed. On 4th December, 2023, he was arrested and charged with "accessing a computer system for a dishonest purpose." Spending two nights in jail, Barry faced two court appearances before being released on bail.

On 18th December, Barry appeared in court for the third time, pleading not guilty to the charges. Opting for a trial by jury, he sought justice for his actions. The next court appearance, a Case Review, is scheduled for 10:15am on Friday, 23rd February, at the Wellington District Court, which you are invited to attend.

The implications of Barry's findings are significant, as they raise questions about the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 mRNA vaccinations, and confirm deep concerns and alarm that this drug is ineffective and doing far more harm than good. It is essential that these concerns are thoroughly investigated and addressed to protect the well-being of the public.

Barry's case serves as a stark reminder that speaking up for what is right, even in the face of adversity, is a responsibility we all share. The pursuit of truth and the protection of public health should always prevail, no matter the obstacles encountered along the way.

Is the data Barry released accurate?

According to our reliable source, we can say, "Yes, it appears to be so!"

Here is a summary of what we know from the data Barry released but which is now being suppressed by way of a legal injunction:

- In a single vaccination center located in Invercargill, 51 individuals received their vaccinations in a span of two hours and unfortunately all of them have passed away. - Meanwhile, out of the 837 individuals who received their vaccinations at a different center, 253 have also met the same fate. - This translates to a mortality rate of 30% among the vaccinated individuals at that particular center. - In another vaccination center, out of 923 individuals who received their vaccinations, 276 have passed away. - Several other vaccination centers across the country have also recorded a mortality rate of close to 30%.

Investigation - not Persecution!

Rather than punishing good-hearted whistle-blowers like Barry and labelling him and others as purveyors of false information, we must launch an immediate inquiry - this is of such massive, grave consequences that it cannot wait for Winston Peter's inquiry into COVID. If the data is accurate, then people are needlessly dying as I type.

Can we trust the data? If we can, what measures will be implemented to handle it? Or will it be ignored and covered up, denying the possibility of "killing fields"? This is unacceptable. We must immediately conduct fair and thorough inquiries, as all evidence suggests that the data is accurate. If this is verified, then we are dealing with a serious public health crisis caused by our healthcare system, with potential implications for criminal behaviour.

First, do no harm!

Before conducting an inquiry that will require a significant amount of time, the distribution of mRNA vaccines must be stopped immediately. There is abundant proof that these medications may be causing harm. Medical experts and healthcare workers who persist in promoting this drug, while making unsupported assertions of its safety and efficacy, are violating the Hippocratic Oath and the Nuremberg Code. They have had ample opportunity to recognise that their continued support of this drug borders on criminal behaviour, if not outright criminality.

Therefore, put a stop to it immediately and investigate!

Please read this excellent article by "Flag 'n Fix":

Barry Young, Whistleblower

Here is an article with proof we are being lied to:

Proof The CDC Knowingly Lied When Claiming The mRNA Vaccines "Reduce Hospitalizations And Deaths."

More and more individuals are becoming aware of this ongoing catastrophe, however, their awareness is not increasing quickly enough. Thus, please help to share this information widely. Thank you!