top of page
  • Writer's pictureCol The Farmer

Ivermectin[IVM]... the drug that literally terrifies Big-pharma

(Updated 7 March 2022)

The discovery of IVM


As I write, the virus is working its way through the New Zealand population. The most unwell person on my books is triple-jabbed. Other than that, I see no apparent difference between jabbed and not, although I'd say the jabbed are not doing quite so well. A handful of infected people have taken Ivermectin upon getting infected, and the results are more than convincing. Within hours of taking the first dose, their symptoms improved dramatically. Yet, despite the wealth of evidence, experts and authorities continue to bag this safe and effective medicine and deny access. I think this is criminal harm when the evidence is clear: Ivermectin reduces deaths by about 80%!

Before reading Colin's article below, please watch this shocking short film that outlines what I think is criminal behaviour.

Dear Andy (Short Film)

"Watch the new short film by Oracle Films, Dr. Tess Lawrie recites a letter to Dr. Andrew Hill and asks him what made him turn his back on a potential cure for Covid-19.

In October 2020 Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

But on January 18th 2021, Dr. Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigor, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”

The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. What were his reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?

One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr. Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr. Hill during the same time frame."