top of page

When Two “Helpful” Medications Quietly Increase Risk

  • Writer: Gary Moller
    Gary Moller
  • 2 hours ago
  • 5 min read
Hands hold blue and white pill packs near a shelf of boxed medications. The setting is a pharmacy with a colorful, organized layout.

A hypothetical case worth examining carefully

I have written extensively over the years about polypharmacy, the layering of multiple medications upon ageing physiology, often with the best of intentions; but with the most serious of unintended consequences.


We must not fall into the trap of thinking that risk only begins when someone is taking five, six, or ten drugs. Even one or two medications, taken daily over the long term, can meaningfully alter physiology. Two drugs can be enough. Particularly when they both dampen the same systems.


Let us consider a hypothetical case.


A woman in her 60s, living independently, managing chronic but not life-threatening health issues. She experiences intermittent blood pressure spikes, episodes of anxiety and low mood, and difficulty sleeping, especially when congestion disturbs her breathing at night.


She is prescribed:

  • Propranolol for blood pressure spikes and the physical symptoms of anxiety

  • Promethazine (Phenergan) at night to assist sleep and reduce airway congestion


Individually, these prescriptions may appear reasonable. Together, used daily for months or years, they deserve careful review. This is not an attack on medicine. It is a call for vigilance and perspective.


What These Medications Actually Do

Propranolol blocks beta-adrenergic receptors. It reduces the influence of adrenaline on the heart and blood vessels. The heart rate slows. Blood pressure drops. The physical sensations of anxiety are dampened. The body’s stress response is muted by this drug.


Promethazine is a sedating antihistamine with strong anticholinergic effects. It does not restore natural sleep rhythms; rather, it chemically suppresses central nervous system activity. It induces drowsiness, dries secretions, and impairs alertness and reaction speed.


Both drugs reduce physiological responsiveness. One turns down sympathetic tone.The other suppresses central neural signalling. In an ageing body, that cumulative dampening really matters.


The Overlapping Effects

These medications do not oppose one another. They act in parallel, each reducing adaptability.


Consider the following:

  • Both can lower blood pressure or blunt compensatory responses.

  • Both can impair alertness and reaction time.

  • Both reduce autonomic flexibility.

  • Both may contribute to fatigue and emotional flattening.


By the sixth decade of life, normal ageing already brings:

  • Reduced baroreceptor sensitivity.

  • Slower cardiovascular reflexes.

  • Declining muscle mass.

  • Greater vulnerability to orthostatic hypotension.

  • Reduced bone density in many women.


Adding two long-term dampening agents narrows the safety margin.


Can she safely drive a car these days? Is she at risk to herself as well as to others? These are fair questions to be asking.


Orthostatic Hypotension and Reduced Compensation

When a person stands from sitting or lying down, the body must respond immediately to maintain blood flow to the brain.


This requires:

  1. Constriction of blood vessels.

  2. An increase in heart rate.

  3. Rapid stabilisation of blood pressure.


Propranolol blunts the heart’s ability to accelerate. Promethazine can contribute to vasodilation and postural blood pressure drops.


The combined effect may lead to:

  • Light-headedness upon standing.

  • Transient visual dimming.

  • Dizziness, particularly at night.

  • Unsteadiness or near-falls.


These are not rare occurrences in older adults on such combinations.


Sedation Is Not Restoration

Promethazine may produce sleepiness, but it can disturb natural sleep architecture and impair restorative phases of sleep. Propranolol may alter melatonin regulation and affect dreaming and sleep depth.


Over time, this hypothetical woman may experience:

  • Persistent fatigue despite adequate hours in bed.

  • Slower thinking and reduced clarity.

  • Emotional blunting.

  • Reduced drive and motivation.


If anxiety or low mood were part of the original presentation, one must question whether dampening central physiology long term is strengthening resilience or quietly reducing it.


A Special Focus on Falls

Here the discussion becomes urgent. Falls in older women are often the beginning of a cascade of decline.


The well-recognised sequence is:

Fall→

Hip fracture→

Surgical repair→

Immobilisation→

Rapid muscle loss→

Venous stasis→

Pneumonia or pulmonary embolism→

Functional decline→


Death within a year


One-year mortality after hip fracture in women over 65 remains significant. Many survivors never return to previous independence.


In our hypothetical case, consider the layered risks:

  • Night-time sedation from promethazine.

  • Blunted heart rate response from propranolol.

  • Possible postural blood pressure drops.

  • Slower reaction times.

  • Reduced bone density.


Even a single poorly compensated postural shift, particularly during a night-time bathroom visit, may be enough.  I believe the complications that arise from falls are the leading causes of early and preventable death in elderly women.


Preventable is the key word.


The Deeper Question

If her conditions are chronic but not life-threatening, it is entirely reasonable to ask:

  • Is long-term nightly promethazine still necessary?

  • Are blood pressure spikes being addressed at their root?

  • Has orthostatic blood pressure been measured recently?

  • Has fall risk been formally assessed?

  • Are there safer strategies to support sleep and mood, and chronic health issues?


Two medications are not trivial simply because they are only two. Medicine should be dynamic. It should be reviewed, refined, and occasionally reduced.


A Measured Approach

This is not a call for abrupt discontinuation. Propranolol must never be stopped suddenly. Any medication change requires proper medical supervision.


However, careful review may include:

  • Reassessing the indication for each drug.

  • Measuring sitting and standing blood pressure and heart rate.

  • Evaluating cognitive clarity and mood.

  • Assessing muscle strength and bone density.

  • Implementing structured fall-prevention strategies.

  • Addressing underlying drivers of chronic health issues, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and blood pressure variability.


The aim is not to demonise pharmaceuticals. It is to avoid drifting into preventable fragility. It is recognising that most pharmaceuticals "manage" a condition, rather than treat and cure.


Talk to Your Doctor

At the very least, this is a conversation worth having properly with your doctor. Ask plainly whether each medication is still absolutely necessary, whether the current dosages are truly required, and whether they might be reduced safely over time. Enquire whether there are safer alternatives with a lower fall risk or less impact on cognition and blood pressure regulation. A good clinician should welcome such questions.


At the same time, explore whether part of the burden currently carried by medication could be shifted toward strengthening the body itself: addressing nutritional deficiencies, improving protein intake and mineral balance, reducing emotional and environmental stressors, prioritising restorative sleep, even something as simple as a brief midday rest and nap can make a difference.


Techniques such as Buteyko breathing to improve airway control, structured strength and balance exercises, regular outdoor walking, red light therapy, meditation, Tai Chi may help nervous system regulation, while enhancing physical and emotional resilience.


None of this is naïve or anti-medical. It reflects the enduring principles that have stood the test of time: let food be thy medicine, and trust the body’s capacity to heal when properly supported.


Final Reflections

Polypharmacy is an obvious risk. But even one or two long-term medications can meaningfully reshape physiology over time. In a woman in her 60s, independence, strength, and resilience must remain central priorities.


When medications dampen the body’s adaptive systems, the trade-offs must be consciously weighed, not passively inherited.


Falls are rarely accidents in isolation. They are often the predictable consequence of layered vulnerability. It is far better to step back early and review than to respond later to preventable harm, such as injuries from a preventable fall.


Medical Disclaimer:

This article discusses a hypothetical scenario for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Medication adjustments must only be undertaken in consultation with a qualified medical practitioner. If you recognise similarities to your own situation, seek personalised medical guidance before making any changes.


A parrot with spread wings against a forest backdrop. Text reads: Strength, freedom, and personal responsibility—lived, not outsourced.

Comments


bottom of page