Are Sinister Forces Attempting to Manipulate Reality?
This article helps you answer:
Are the protesters a disorganised and violent rabble, or are they peaceful and clear with their messaging?
Are the police using excessive violence to hurt and intimidate protesters?
Are the police using "Agent Provocateur" tactics to stir up violence and justify police actions, including violence?
Is Mainstream Media (MSM) covering up police violence?
Please keep these four questions in mind as you read what is written and what you see in the videos and pictures: Then, to get the discussion going, give us your answers in the comments section below the article, and comment on what other people have to say.
Please forward this article to other people as quickly as you can, thank you!
Let's examine the evidence.
Two weeks ago, the Government and the police lost control of the narrative after images of police beating up women circulated around the world. We wondered how they would respond to regain control of the narrative. The authorities are attempting to regain control on the ground and to turn people against the protesters this week and it has not been pleasant, and, at times violent. As you read and view the photos and videos, I want you to question what you see on MSM and from the Sauce of all Truth: Go with your gut instinct, and common-sense: Cast aside the conditioning we have all been subjected to by torrent of lies, better known as propaganda. Keep asking, then answering as best you can questions such as:
Who is causing this violence and who are on the receiving end: the police, the protesters, or maybe even a third party?
Are they using excessive violence, while covering it up and lying, and doing so with the assistance of MSM?
To remind yourself of the day when the police, Trevor Mallard and Company lost the upper hand, here it is:
So, to regain lost ground, in addition to mounting a charm offensive, are they also resorting to dirty and underhand tactics, including using violence to manipulate the public's view of the protesters? Let's explore this possibility.
As the saying goes: A picture is worth a thousand lies!
Let this be very clear: Individually, or in small groups, the police have been great to deal with. In fact, many are Maori and Pasifika these days, some presumably, are related to my partner and our children. They are decent, peace-loving people who joined the Force, proud to serve their community. They are our family and our friends: Let's keep it that way.
Many police, presumably the majority, and not just the ones at Parliament, will be extremely unhappy to be required to act with force and violence against the people they have sworn to serve and protect. Unfortunately, there are always a few bad apples in the crate who spoil it for everyone else; in this case, a few cops, better described as thugs and wannabe MMA fighters.
One must question the police's leadership, their competence and their motivations, and those higher above in the chain of command and not heap all of the blame onto the police on the ground.
Historically, "I was only following orders", is the most common excuse used by footsoldiers when defending accusations against them of committing war crimes: However, this is not a valid defence under international law.
It is common knowledge that at least 100 police officers have resigned since the protest began two weeks ago. We can understand why and good on them for doing the right thing!
Are the police using unreasonable force, and is MSM covering it up; literally?
Winston Peter's interview is worth listening to before proceeding:
Now, let's look at some of the evidence behind these allegations against the protesters.
Watch this video and make up your own mind: is this evidence enough of a police officer punching and eye-gouging a person? Would this stand up in a court of law? Is Stuff deliberately concealing it?
Here are photos kindly supplied by the gentleman who was on the receiving end of this alleged excessive use of force:
Here is an interview with a paramedic who attended to the injured people after the morning's violence:
Are the police and the New Zealand Government using Agent Provocateur tactics to distort the public's view of the protesters?
“subversive actions of people posing as protestors is an underhand and dishonest tactic that doesn’t fit with New Zealand values.”
The majority of the protesters, by far, are kind and peaceful people; they consist of New Zealanders from all walks of life who genuinely want an end to mandates. Many of them are health professionals who have been mandated out of their jobs and I know many of them personally. They are not violent or confused people; they are the opposite.
MSM typically portrays the protesters as a mish-mash of hateful anti-vaxers; they are not and there is no confusion about why they are camped in front of Parliament - although some want more, some less, they all want an end to mandates. They want to be heard by those they elected to serve them, and who have, for two years, chosen to ignore their cries of anguish as their rights and freedoms have been progressively removed. Many of the protesters have been maimed by the vaccine or have had loved ones die or be maimed, or lost to suicide. Many have lost their businesses, their jobs and, some have lost their homes. At the very least, they are asking for the mandates to end. Freedom to go about their lives without the interference of Government overreach and freedom to decide what they do with their body. They are there to protect the next generation from what the evidence shows is an unsafe drug that we still know very little about.
They are asking for the end of the mandates, including a halt to what is coercion to inject the entire population with a drug that is clearly neither safe nor effective: Let's be clear about that.
They are not camped at Parliament with violent intentions: they simply want to be heard.
Some will agree the protest has attracted a handful of trouble-makers, including some of the mentally ill people who now populate Wellington's streets, but they have been well-controlled by the movement. However, within our midst, there have been some most unusual trouble-makers who cannot be so easily be explained away. Let's now focus on these people.
There has been a handful of people who just do not fit into the gathering at Parliament which is more like a peace and love concert than a protest. The people I'm referring to look more like the white supremacist gang members that New Zealand has so reluctantly accepted as deportees from Australia over recent years. Not that I'm saying these infiltrators are members of white supremacist gangs or mates with the foreign terrorist, Brenton Tarrant, but they wouldn't be visually out of place if they were.
"An agent provocateur is a person who is employed by the government or the police to encourage certain groups of people to break the law, so they can arrest them."
Take a look look at this bloke who caused trouble yesterday morning (more about him later). Nice glasses, by the way. What's your lens prescription?
Is he a gang member? Do you recognise him? What's the fancy ear microphone for?
Are Agents Provocateur being planted within the protest movement, as alleged, with the intention of causing trouble, and creating photo opportunities for a bought and manipulated MSM? And, just who is provoking and dishing out the violence: The police, the protesters, or a third party?
Read this message received last night (22 Feb) from a woman whose father is inside the Freedom Village:
"Police intervention has again turned ugly and the danger to the people is at its highest point. Live coverage from inside is buffering and lots of videos are not being received. My father says that the current police activity is more calculated and forcefully brutal than anything we saw in the initial Police riot. My dad witnessed this morning premeditated brutality on a large scale which it appears we are not getting full video coverage of. In part because this attack was strategically placed on the people as they were still in bed and sleeping. People were woken by the noise and put directly from slumber to battle like a medieval village raid in the night. A large part of the police lineup is exceptionally large men with shields and batons, these men in description sounded more like pro rugby players heading into a scrum. The people in their wake scattered like Skittles is the description my father has given. He says if you thought the brutal arrests of the last attack were bad, this is worse. Dad believes that if we don't get as many confident, smart people with the relevant skillset down there immediately, this will all come to a sad and brutal fate for our people within days. We need strong and capable people with the insight into how police are attacking us to lead our people now."
Wellington protest group :
Media Statement – 22/2/22
PROTESTORS CONCERNED ABOUT POLICE INACTION OVER OFFENDERS
"The Wellington protest group is shocked by the alleged violent and antisocial behaviour exhibited during the past 48 hours by a number of individuals who do not appear to be associated with the protest.
Throughout, we have continually sought to work with Police to identify individuals involved in any criminal acts and maintain a safe and peaceful environment. We are ever-mindful that approximately 15 percent of protestors present are either children or aged over 60, and 55 percent are women.
However, significant concern has arisen during the past 48 hours over a notable lack of action by Police against identified individuals committing offences outside the protest area.
Emerging evidence of potential external involvement in placing these agitators among the protest is even more worrying.
The individual who sprayed faecal matter at Police on Monday morning was unknown to protestors. He intentionally hid behind a protestor as he sprayed the police, wore a ski mask and fled immediately. Protest organisers have asked Police for pictures from surveillance footage to help us ascertain if the person is still amongst the protest. Police denied the request.
We are now worried he may have returned to the site to perpetrate further violent acts.
Video and photographic evidence (see Clashes erupt at Parliament Protest, accusations of 'paid police agitators' - Daily Telegraph NZ ) has emerged that agitators use earpieces identical to that used by Police. An individual letting off loud fireworks to the rear of the protest on Tuesday morning, making a sound similar to gunshots that naturally increased tension, was immediately stopped by other protestors, and he was handed over to Police. Footage of this person is widely available on social media.
It is not surprising that many of those at the protest site are now suspicious that a deliberate and coordinated action by external parties is being waged to escalate tensions and smear the protestors".
Is there any evidence of "False Flag" operations?
A false flag operation is an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party.
Have a close look at this "dramatic" footage of an "anti-vax" protester driving into the police lines and do your best to answer the following questions:
He comes from behind the police lines: the protesters are on the other side, so how on earth did he get there?
He slows right down and comes to a complete halt, so this was the most gentle of ramming attempts ever captured on video. Why?
We never get to see this "anti-vax terrorist", so we can't even attempt to identify him.
It is assumed he is an anti-vaxxer. Did he say he was?
We do not see him being led away in this footage but reports indicate he was not roughed up like happened with other protesters. Why?
No details have since been released about the identity or motivation of this domestic terrorist. Why?
So, as gentle as it turned out to be, this, with a little editing, makes for dramatic terrorist stuff for MSM news, also justifying the escalation of force. My question to you is this: Was this for real, or contrived, or an angry loon who changed his mind at the last moment?
Did the police know what was about to happen? The police officer in the image is holding a tool for breaking a car window. What's he expecting to use it for?
Read this and make up your own mind:
More video here and you can see the tools used for breaking car windows in use. Are these standard-issue tools occasions such as these?
By the way, I hear that one independent video reporter had fruit juice poured over him and his equipment just seconds before the police action to stir up the protesters. Talk about perfect timing for this to happen. Was this the action of a provocateur, or a mere case of a careless or nervous person?
Now, watch this shocking short video several times (keep an eye on the man in the pink singlet):
This man, a loner, it appears, which is unusual at this event, has a bag of fireworks. He attempted to turn an already very heated situation (caused by the police) violent by setting off fireworks that simulated gunfire (it was said there was a backup squad of armed riot police waiting behind Parliament).
As you can see in the video above, he was quickly apprehended by the protesters wishing to keep the peace.
Have a good look at the video in this Tweet:
He has an interesting T-Shirt. Do you recognise it? Do you recognise him? Do you recognise the tattoos?
Now watch this video and take note that the person in the video had a degree in the study of Fear from what appears to be some kind of military college. I'm not making any connections here other than to point out that the word "fear" is prominent on this agitator's shirt:
Here is the culprit who has what appears to be a police-issue earpiece (can anyone identify who he is and who he is working for?):
Without beating him up, the protesters handed this scoundrel to the police (image below of them manding him over), who, to the police's credit, did not beat him up either, or even handcuff him as far as we can tell. There has been no mention in the media nor is there any other information about what the police have done with him. You would have thought that MSM and the police would be all over this and similar stories.
The following video shows you how tense things got yesterday morning, as a consequence of police actions - do you agree? Was this, and the police action later in the day timed and orchestrated to disrupt peak hour traffic, to annoy Wellington commuters and provide dramatic live footage for prime time morning and evening news, thus, hopefully, turning the public against the Freedom Movement? What do you think?
Below is the video of a police officer (can you identify him for us, so he can explain what he was doing): It looks like he is spraying fellow officers with what looks like pepper spray.
The protesters were to the far left behind police lines, so if he thought he was spraying protesters, my advice to him is to go immediately to SpecSavers. At the very end of the clip, you will see one officer affected by the spray. The officers affected were reported to have required hospital treatment. Along with every other New Zealander, we wish them the best of medical treatment, rapid healing and a full recovery, so they can get back on the beat, working hard to keep the peace and catch criminals.
The police and media then accused the protesters of flinging acid at the police. Is there sufficient evidence to call this a "False Flag Operation"?
Similar accusations were made about protesters throwing faeces at the police. To be more accurate, it appears it was one person who sprayed, rather than throwing.
"The individual who sprayed faecal matter at Police on Monday morning was unknown to protestors. He intentionally hid behind a protestor as he sprayed the police, wore a ski mask and fled immediately."
To date, I have failed to find any hard evidence of this incident being real. Can anyone supply photos or videos that capture the incident? Has whatever was sprayed been tested and confirmed as being faecal matter? The whole incident comes across as being dodgy. What do you think? Comment below.
There have been other attempts to discredit the protesters and paint them as violent and vile ultra-right extremists. Take a close look at these Trump MAGA supporters who turned up on the first day but never returned. They were made unwelcome and were kept away from the main staging area.
Two and maybe three of these men have expensive megaphones, three of them have multiple Trump flags on long, extendable aluminium poles. This is not a cheap setup. Were they hired to conduct a "False Flag Operation"?
So, four mates hear there is a Freedom Convoy making its way to Wellington:
"Hey, Bros, let's get us some megaphones, high-grade extendable aluminium poles, and a bunch of Trump flags and get us on down to Wellington later today".
"Easy-as, Bro, but who's paying, and where do we get the gear?"
"No worries, Bro, the $2 shop has them".
Who is causing and dishing out the violence?
I've been at the protest for several hours each day since the first tent was pitched, talking to people and taking photos. My impression, other than when the police come along and spoil the fun, this is the most friendly and peaceful protest ever in history; but you wouldn't know it if you watch MSM, or listen to the Prime Minister.
Take a look at this video and decide for yourself where the truth lies (good wordplay eh?):
And this one below is another beauty! "Lies About Schools":
Who are the trouble-makers?
The following police action turned out, allegedly, to be for the purpose of putting in place a couple of concrete bollards. I think, in the end, this could have been done with better communication, and a small contingent of cops to escort the forklift.
Now that you have read this article and viewed the videos, please tell me this, in your own words in the comments below what you think. Here are a few more questions to help you along:
Has the provocation mostly come from the police, or from the protesters?
Do you think there are "Agents Provocateur" operating to undermine, discredit the protestors and provoke violence?
Just who do you think is behind these alleged apparent False Flag and Agent Provocateur Operations: the police, the Government, the military, intelligence services, or some other party?
Do you think the rank and file police officers are fully aware of these operations? And,
If they are aware, do you think they are in favour of these tactics, or are they merely following orders?
So far, whoever is behind these alleged operations has failed to incite the protesters to violence, but it appears they are doing their darndest, including using dirty tactics to make the protesters appear to be the baddies. The police are looking for just one incident to justify sending in the riot squad to clean out the camp. Actually, I think they have already created enough False Flags to justify a forceful and brutal eviction before the weekend. I hope not.
If it is agreed that this is the reality of what is being witnessed, this is not the New Zealand way. By far, most of the rank and file cops are decent people who will be appalled by this kind of underhand tactic, which is clearly intended to incite violence within what is a peaceful occupation.
This is also a callout to Citizen Investigators:
Do you recognise any of the people in these photos and in the video, where there are questions about their identities and motivations?
Do you know who they are working for: Are they working for the police, the government, or another agency?
We need to know and we need your help with finding out who these people are, so they can come forward and explain themselves.
Some interesting supporting information.
How The Government used a public health emergency to undermine our freedoms and human rights
A must-watch video (How Parker & Co “updated” aka ‘removed’ New Zealanders constitutional rights. It seems like Andrew Little is now the one calling the shots in regards to what is demonstrably justified):
Is this where New Zealand is heading?
Omricon is a mild infection for most people, so it is time to restore our basic freedoms. The following images remind us things may have already gone too far - let's back up quickly by ending the mandates:
Do we comply or don't we?
Winnie's onto a winner!
Our Hero and one of many, and who we are fighting for!
Do you recognise this person in the image below, spotted attempting to mingle with the protesters yesterday, but not quite fitting in: Is she an agent provocateur?