The Consequences of Disinformation
Or is it misinformation?
As I type this, yet another rescue helicopter flies past our house to deliver a sick person to Wellington Hospital (The helicopter's flight path is past our home). We've been living here for 40 years and never have the rescue helicopters been so busy as they have been since the mRNA jab roll-out began late last year. It wakes us in the early hours of the morning as sweeps past on its way to the hospital.
Our health system is close to collapse due to the increase in people seeking medical assistance, the rundown of medical infrastructure, the lack of investment in training more nurses and doctors, and the firing of those who refused to get the jab, or the follow-up boosters. For an example of misinformation, they are grossly understating just how many health sector personnel have been lost, not just by mandated jabs, but the many who decided to quit first, retire early, or not continue past 65. Only those mandated out of jobs are being counted.
The jab is killing more people than it saves if any. Saying that the jab is killing and maiming people is not misinformation: It is a fact. For those in positions of authority who continue to say that this is misinformation, they are committing a crime against their people.
Robust health does not come from sticking a needle into a person.
During the peaceful occupation of Parliament Grounds (now called a riot), it was claimed by the Government that we were creating a super spreader event and many would die.
Here are the so-called rioters:
They whipped up fear, hysteria and anger, thus justifying the use of weaponised state power to break up the peaceful occupation of a bit of lawn. Yes, I guess it was a super spreader event but that was in January and February and I've kept in touch with many of the participants and I do not know of a single death. Sure many did get COVID but most hardly felt a thing while some certainly did suffer unpleasant symptoms, but nobody died. Actually, the way we can get out of this pandemic mess is for every healthy person to catch COVID as soon as possible while we protect the elderly and the immune-compromised, all the while investing in health. Instead, they promote the lies that a face nappy, social-distancing and an ineffective jab that kills and maims is going to save us.
"Would you like chips or a doughnut with your jab"?
I've had long enough now to have seen many cases of COVID and conclude the following:
The least sick with COVID are the fully unjabbed.
The sickest with COVID are the fully-jabbed.
Nobody I know of has died because of COVID (not to be confused "with COVID").
I know of many people who have died unusually close to the shots, usually by stroke or heart attack.
I know of many people with long-lasting side effects of the jab, including heart and neurological damage.
Please take a few minutes to read this article:
That the Government is maintaining not just a cone of silence about the carnage they are wreaking on people's lives, they are ramping up the propaganda that their COVID response is saving lives, while censoring anyone who questions their narrative!
Censorship is alive and thriving: I've been suspended from LinkedIn and am on a 4th and final warning with Facebook, despite having written about 50 articles on the Freedom Village at Parliament, only a couple can be found these days using Google search. Try this: gary moller freedom village parliament, as an example. My articles are disappearing one by one.
My friend, Dr Guy Hatchard, released a press statement on this matter, referring to the Queen of Misinformation, our very own Prime Minister. Please take a few minutes to read his release below and pass it around. The best way we can counter official disinformation, or is it misinformation - hey, who cares - lies! - is to talk to others and share information that is more akin to reality.
Jacinda Ardern leads the way with disinformation
Guy Hatchard PhD
Jacinda Ardern, who has escaped the continuing restrictions in New Zealand to visit Europe and speak at NATO, has met with her counterparts in France and Spain to suggest a global alliance to combat disinformation. Ardern spoke to them about the New Zealand capital grounds riot and played to her gullible audience by suggesting the threat to social cohesion and public health in New Zealand society was originating in Russia and might result in war.
Ardern has had talks with President Macron which reportedly included disinformation. I am not sure that the events in Wellington would have qualified as a riot in France. There were no molotov cocktails of the kind you see in the frequent French protests, mostly people were playing music, engaging in conversations, and enjoying camping out, whilst standing up for their rights—something legally allowed in New Zealand. I suspect that Macron probably relied on Ardern as his ‘one source of truth’ when it came to descriptions of NZ riots (??).
How is it possible that our lame duck prime minister can swan about in the military circles of Europe making outrageous claims about New Zealand society without being challenged by our press? Quite the reverse, Stuff newspaper seemed to enjoy reporting Ardern’s sensational characterisations of NZ protests.
It seems to me that many of the world’s current leaders are busy winding each other up with more and more outrageous exaggerations which only serve to up the fear factor among themselves. They are victims of disinformation, but it appears to be of their own making—acting like villagers rushing about in a panic when someone shouts out ‘snake’ when they have only seen a rope.
In such a panicked atmosphere, it is hard to strike up a rational conversation with our politicians. All parties have firmly closed the door to two-way communication with their constituents on pandemic policy. Public information has become limited to a succession of carefully-crafted, government-approved sound bites, which fade rapidly together into an aggregation of false interpretations and assumptions which inevitably take root in our social psyche.
We are daily schooled to be afraid. We are in the middle of a pandemic (??), which is clearly now milder than flu, promoting a vaccine (??) which doesn’t work and causes severe adverse effects. We are religiously trained to wear masks which studies show don’t work, whose constant use is proven to cause headaches and respiratory defects. Our every move is being tracked by Apps which collect our personal data that can and are being misused.
For six months I have been writing at the HatchardReport.com long format refutations of disinformation being promoted by our government. I have consistently referenced my work to published scientific work in learned journals. Unfortunately solid information in the modern age has become fleeting and quickly forgotten.
No sooner have you shot down one canard such as the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines (they are not effective and don’t deserve the name vaccine) through reference to many studies, than a government advertising campaign starts up, as it did this week, telling the public in 30 seconds that mRNA vaccination provides greater protection than anything (yes anything) natural immunity can provide. Clearly the government’s advertising copywriters did not read this British Medical Journal article and couldn’t care less about the truth.
It is a rather one sided battle if the government has paid the media to report their false story and exclude your referenced discussion. It becomes an organised campaign to deceive the public when the referenced work of scientists is labelled disinformation likely to start a war by our prime minister. The absurdity should make us laugh, but the depth of modern psychological propaganda is being exploited to the full. It is no longer a laughing matter.
The Hatchard Report is available as a record and referenced source of science reporting intended to alert the public to the risks of novel biotechnology. Our public health authorities have never informed us honestly about the long term risks. Despite the effective collapse of early evidence compiled and widely publicised by Pfizer PR campaigns, our government has doubled down on mRNA vaccine use. Apparently our health czars have decided to follow the government and ignore the accumulating evidence of harm. It can’t be ignored any longer. They have to stand up to the government disinformation storm.
Last week I reported on a paper co-authored by Prof. Sander Greenland, perhaps one of the most experienced statisticians/epidemiologists in the world. He found a 50% increase in serious adverse events in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated group in the Pfizer trial. The authors point out that this finding is consistent with the findings of pharmacovigilance databases in Europe and the US. They also show that the risk of these adverse outcomes exceeds any possible benefit from reduced Covid-19 hospitalization.
Another article along the same lines is a case-control study from France, which found an 8-fold increase in myocarditis after the 2nd Pfizer injection, compared to millions of controls from the French population.
This is consistent with findings in other areas of the world. For example, a recent study of myocarditis & pericarditis from Hong Kong, found a rate of myopericarditis of 37 per 100,000. This is equivalent to 1 case per 2,700 male adolescents injected with dose 2 of Pfizer mRNA vaccine.
There are always going to be many unknowns associated with evolving scientific assessment, but there is accumulating evidence of substantial harm from the Pfizer injection which is accruing from several independent sources. The long term risks should not and cannot be hidden from the public any longer. Nor should the government be allowed to continue making false assertions of safety and efficacy contrary to scientific fact. The misleading saturation advertising and the public posturing of our prime minister has become a scandal and an embarrassment to our nation.
Guy Hatchard PhD